Which standards should I use for my PCB libraries? What factors will affect the manufacturability of my final PCB? What are the common errors that I need to be extra wary of when I define my libraries to prevent unneeded PCB prototype iterations? These are some of the many question’s PCB designers ask before starting their designs. We decided to address these issues to make life easier for PCB designers. So, we sat down with Natasha Baker and asked a few questions faced by PCB designers during the selection of PCB libraries.
Natasha Baker is the Founder of SnapEDA, a search engine for PCB libraries and other models needed to design circuit boards, used by a million electronics designers worldwide. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Applied Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. With a decade of experience pertaining to the PCB industry, she has learned common pitfalls that engineers make when designing electronics.
Sierra Circuits: Why do PCB libraries matter?
Natasha Baker: We need PCB libraries to ensure proper manufacturing. PCB libraries are so important because they affect the manufacturability and yield of your design. For instance, an improper pin-out in a design can render your PCB completely dysfunctional, resulting in time-consuming re-work, or even unnecessary board respins. Further, if pads are off by even a fraction of a millimeter, it can lead to improper soldering. This is why spending time to ensure your libraries are well-defined is crucial.
PCB libraries don’t always get the attention they deserve within the industry. However, I think that’s short-sighted because they’re the backbone of any electronics design.
SC: Which are the frequently followed standards when creating PCB libraries?
NB: One of the most popular standardization bodies working on creating standards for footprints – or land patterns – is the IPC. The latest standard for surface mount components is the IPC-7351B, and the release of an updated version of that standard is imminent. These standards define all aspects of the footprints – including aspects like the solder mask, solder paste, and courtyard. Organizations like IEEE also cover symbol standards, especially for common discrete components.
SC: What are the common mistakes made by designers during the PCB component selection?
NB: Pin mapping issues are probably the most basic mistake made by designers. Mapping the symbol pins to the footprint pins is extremely tedious – especially on a high-pin count part like an FGPA – so it’s not too surprising. But this is usually one of the first mistakes to burn an engineer.
Another frequent issue we see amongst newer engineers is placing silkscreen over the copper pads, which can lead to bad solder joints.
In terms of more seasoned engineers, the most common issue by far is misinterpreting a component’s bottom view as being its top view. When this happens, the component gets “mirrored”. There are some hacks to fix this issue (in some cases the component can be flipped on the board and its legs bent backward), but obviously, this is a pretty unpleasant one to run into.
SC: Do we need to update PCB libraries with examples?
NB: The standards change, and that means things like recommendations on the copper lands, or even the default orientation of a footprint can change (which matters because it’s required for the pick-and-place machine). So yes, staying on top of the latest industry standards is a good practice.
SC: Is it important to verify PCB libraries?
NB: Yes, whether you get a library from a website (such as SnapEDA or a component vendor’s website) or your team creates it themselves, it is crucial to go through a standard set of checks as part of your DFM process, for the reasons mentioned earlier. The cost of an error is high, and because libraries are so detail-oriented, it is important to always verify the details.
SC: What is the approach of larger organizations in regard to PCB libraries?
NB: Times are changing rapidly in the PCB industry. It used to be mainly large corporations designing electronics, and they had dedicated librarians to support the engineers. But as design teams have gotten smaller, we’ve seen a huge surge in engineers looking for ready-to-use libraries. It’s amazing how much things have changed in just 5 years.
SC: How do you stand out from others?
NB: I’d say that engineers really need to try it to experience the magic. SnapEDA saves engineers so much time, and we keep adding new features to improve their lives. Some examples, are our computer-vision symbol builder InstaBuild (www.snapeda.com/instabuild), our computer-vision symbol builder, and InstaPart (www.snapeda.com/instapart), our 24-hour request service for PCB libraries.
To find free symbols, footprints, and 3D models for your designs, visit the SnapEDA website.